| 30 posts found | |
|---|---|
|
2/10/12 11:18:23 AM#21
Originally posted by wormed But it isn't that lawless either where companies openly lie to its investors and expect to get away with it. |
|
|
2/10/12 11:24:30 AM#22
Originally posted by Khole ... you really think they sold 5.6 million more copies since then? ... ... The point is that they DON'T have 10.3 million ACTIVE subscribers. What their definition of "subscription" most likely differs than what it SHOULD be. |
|
|
2/10/12 11:25:54 AM#23
Originally posted by wormed Where is your proof of that? If what they say about their profits is true, it doesn't even matter. |
|
|
2/10/12 11:30:52 AM#24
Originally posted by wormed im not a blizzard fan but blizzard spells out what sub means better than any other company
World of Warcraft’s Subscriber Definition EQNext press http://EQ3Wire.com EQ2: Freeport server |
|
|
2/10/12 11:53:51 AM#25
lol I already droped my SWtor sub. Its a Single Player game with no varation once you play 1 toon on ether side you have seen 90%of its content replayablity is the worst I have seen in any game. You will see the numbers are going to start droping for Swtor once peep can get out of there subs. |
|
|
2/10/12 7:49:24 PM#26
Dont matter to me. I could only handle one hour of this game before i quit. There is better out there. Edgar F Greenwood |
|
|
2/11/12 4:40:26 AM#27
Someone should fix the title to: "Blizzards WoW hit a historical reported revenue low, down below even 2007 revenues." or "Blizzard earned less from WoWs regular sales at the end of 2011, than it did in 2007 with just 8 Million player." "Release of Portugese client failed to boost WoW playernumbers above previous quarter" "Release of the long hyped Deathwing content failed to reboost WoW playernumbers, above previous quarter" "Was Koticks claim of WoW being unnaffected by SWToR just hot air?" Profits soared for all of Activision Blizzard, not exclusively those of WoW, they probably rather had to compensate for WoW. 'Seamless world' - A world lacking visible or phys. seams, forming forced breaking points during transition and movement;
|
|
|
2/11/12 4:54:23 AM#28
If you sign up for the Annual pass, you are essentially signing a contract. If you fail to honour that contract, you are effectively defaulting on your financial obligations. I am pretty sure that Blizzard will not bother to report this but if they did this will be considered a credit default which as I hope you all know will reflect badly on your credit rating.
Originally posted by Sukiyaki |
|
|
2/11/12 4:59:31 AM#29
regarding annual pass, commentary at joystiq http://wow.joystiq.com/2011/11/11/what-happens-if-a-subscriber-breaks-the-wow-annu/ there is less to the WoW Annual Pass than you think. You aren't signing a contract that will get Blizzard to knock down your door if you don't pay your WoW subscription that month. In fact, there really isn't anything terribly binding here at all. Everything you are committing to results in Blizzard granting you a license to use a product or service and nothing more. That promise is binding in the sense that Blizzard has sole rights over the Diablo 3 and Tyrael's Charger licenses and can revoke them at any time if you don't pay, so it is in your interest as a paying customer who wants to keep using those licenses to pay up. EQNext press http://EQ3Wire.com EQ2: Freeport server |
|
|
2/11/12 10:03:25 AM#30
i thought all the blizzard haters said they were losing millions of people..hahaha "The great thing about human language is that it prevents us from sticking to the matter at hand." |
|