Page 1 of 1
|
|
6/05/07 11:35 PM
|
|
Viewed 6100, Replies 47
|
|
|
What, are you on the Archlord payroll? Obviously you either aren't allowed to, or can't afford to play, other games. If you love to fall asleep at the keyboard because you've been grinding for hours, this is the game for you. |
|
|
|
6/03/07 6:52 AM
|
|
Viewed 854, Replies 28
|
|
|
Dude this is really all academic. As soon as you actually have to manage the packetizing and latency issues involved in a game you see that using stamina to fuel both movement and fighting penalizes melee players because they have to use it to move to the fight and use it to close the distance. Combine that with the fact that melee attacking is way harder to synchronize, and ranged combat is easy as crap to work out in comparison, and the result is that melee is screwed. There is more than one way to use this kind of characteristic I agree 100%, but you'd do much better just to have movement be free, and everyone have a 'mana' pool for special actions because of the latency issues. My advice is: do something really different. |
|
|
|
6/03/07 6:39 AM
|
|
Viewed 854, Replies 28
|
|
Originally posted by Ruthgar Lemme get this straight, you're sick of getting where you want to go, ready to fight, without having to sit down and waste 2 minutes each times you run out of stamina or risk arriving at a fight unable to help because you need another 2 minutes of rest before you can start? Didn't anyone but me play shadowbane and see what a terrible affect this has on melee characters? |
|
|
|
5/17/07 5:17 PM
|
|
Viewed 6300, Replies 58
|
|
Originally posted by Gameloading It's also best not to be in delusional. Korean games are grinders. It's totally reasonable to be dubious about a claim that a Korean game is NOT a grinder, or else why on earth would feature listed #1 be 'No Level Grinding.' Gosh, ya think that the devs are aware that Americans don't like the level grinding? duhhhhhhhhh You can decide for yourself whether you like grinding or not, but don't be smug. |
|
|
|
1/17/07 1:52 PM
|
|
Viewed 447, Replies 4
|
|
|
Ok I'm about 1/100000th of a millimeter from unsubscribing from my RSS feed to MMORPG.com and going with MMOSITE or something. Each feed gives me very little information, redirects me to your page for no reason, and then if I'm lucky I can find a link to the actual story you're talking about.
This is a good example. Would it be so much trouble actually to provide a link to the Dev Chest story you're talking about? For example: Read the current EQ2 Community Dev Chest! Earley |
|
|
|
1/12/07 11:38 AM
|
|
Viewed 715, Replies 14
|
|
Originally posted by Rattrap Probably Gulid Wars, City of Villains AND WoW until the betas for Warhammer and Huxley come along. Vanguard is just boring, not to mention broken. They can't even handle 4000 players, let alone any number of retail players. Launching on the 30th of Jan is a joke. |
|
|
|
1/11/07 3:21 PM
|
|
Viewed 342, Replies 3
|
|
|
I have basically the same question except for brightness. I would like the right mouse button to work on the vertical axis as well as the horisontal one and still steer my toon, and to adjust the sensitivity. The game is growing on me but I find it very difficult to really enjoy it with the fixed vertical camera. An alternative might be that if you can get the left mouse button to steer as well, I would be happy. |
|
|
|
1/11/07 2:35 PM
|
|
Viewed 1106, Replies 28
|
|
Originally posted by brihtwulf Obviously I don't mind other people disagreeing either, as I've stuck with VG through three phases of beta, but I can tell you for a fact that you're in the minority. Brad himself has flamed posters who say things he disagrees with, not even to mention the poor develeopers, friends, and, yes, family he lays into, and he's been famous for not listening to solid advice since back in the MUD days. E |
|
|
|
1/11/07 2:24 PM
|
|
Viewed 645, Replies 14
|
|
Originally posted by ippo What a totally idiotic thing to say. What, are you so desperate to make sure that everyone knows you've played some other MMO that you've lost your mind? I've played them all since MUDs, including UO, AC, Anarchy Online, and Shadowbane (beta and launch), and I think the PvP in WoW is great. But I'm just not some ignorant egomaniac that thinks that my way of thinking is the only way. |
|
|
|
1/11/07 2:19 PM
|
|
Viewed 592, Replies 14
|
|
|
It is your processor. I have a 1.8GHz Intel Core Duo (not core 2 duo!), with a 128MB Radeon X1600 with 1.5GB of ram. That's very similar to your setup except the processor and I get 20-50 fps in all situations, with the graphics maxed in every category except vertical sync and Anti-Aliasing (just 2x not 6x). |
|
|
|
1/11/07 2:16 PM
|
|
Viewed 5043, Replies 161
|
|
Originally posted by Gameloading You can say that again. I've played all the 'free' MMOs, which aren't really free except for Guild Wars, as you can't truly compete unless you buy items from their inevitable Item Stores, and not one of them except Guild Wars comes close to the quality of WoW. Instead of asking a bunch of people to think for you, why don't you just try the game and not judge it before you start? E |
|
|
|
1/11/07 2:10 PM
|
|
Viewed 1106, Replies 28
|
|
|
I've played through a lot of betas and Vanguard is one of the least finished I've seen. The developers and fanbois in that game are some of the most annoying in the history of MMOs. The thing that cracks me up is how they whine about how immature WoW players are, then make it their business to be as pretensious and smug as possible. You simply can't criticize VG without being flamed, no matter how rational or well-founded your opinion is. I gave up trying to have any intelligent discussions about it and now I just make it known that the game is bad and will appeal mainly to players who enjoy the holy trinity of poor performance, forced grouping, and corpse runs (which is around 1.6% of the MMO market, or around 200k players). |
|
|
|
12/19/06 4:56 PM
|
|
Viewed 2620, Replies 51
|
|
|
Geez, another ill-informed half-baked whiny editorial. I only come to MMORPG.com any more to register for the contests and donwload trial games. The editorial staff here is a joke. In fact, most of the stories here aren't any more insightful or better informed than a random World of Warcraft fanboi 1337 post on their forums. Learn to be journalists guys.
|
|
|
|
11/02/06 12:26 PM
|
|
Viewed 11572, Replies 160
|
|
It's true there are no aliens, but I don't think that's worth writing off the whole game if what you really want is a soloable MMO. GW has other problems too, but character creation is actually very strong I believe. There's absolutely no roleplaying going on in that game, which suits me fine. Anyone who wants that will be sorely disappointed though. Also, it's the only game I've ever played where the NON-white characters look good and realistic. The Prophecies game is basically western european types. Factions has a more asian feel to the toons, and the new Nightfall is awesome -- the characters are African and Middle Eastern flavors. E |
|
|
|
11/02/06 11:03 AM
|
|
Viewed 11572, Replies 160
|
|
The new Guild Wars Nightfall is the solo game you're looking for. I'm not kidding. I play WoW and GW both, and they compliment each other well. Of course, they're both basically Blizzard games haha. Earley |
|
|
|
10/30/06 7:12 PM
|
|
Viewed 11572, Replies 160
|
|
Dude, you got your wish. They completely redid the itemization. Now socketable items have sockets for you fill with discovered, refined, or purchased gems that add whatever effects and bonuses you want. This will allow you to customize your character finally. Earley |
|
|
|
10/23/06 3:08 PM
|
|
Viewed 11572, Replies 160
|
|
|
Wow, I would expect an editorial like that from a magazine like People or the New York Times weekend magazine, but from a site that purportedly IS an MMO specialized site, its pretty obvious that you haven't really dug into this topic very much. Most of these things are clearly specified in all the literature and posting or general info freely available about the Burning Crusade beta, which is NOT covered by any NDA and therefore freely available to all.
Clearly you have spent a lot more time writing about WoW than playing it. I think that any reasonable person who's reading the BC beta info can see that BC is going to be very different than the current client. And DEFINITELY anyone that has played before the honor system even went in will be happy as a clam with the new game. I was one of those that mourned the loss of world pvp with the Honor rank system that went in a year ago. New: No more Honor ranks at all. Whole honor system replaced by a new system where you spend your honor points to 'buy' gear. An entirely new PvP arena system, which works a bit like smaller versions of Guild Wars guilds. New battlegrounds with new objectives. 30% More land area. No more 40-man dungeons, ever again (MC, BWL, and AQ40 will remain the last of them). 5- and 10-man instances are de rigeur now, and 25-man being the new cap. Some of the 5- and 10-man instances can take a week for a team of players to complete, playing nightly. Redesigned world itemization, with new resist and damage types. Improved combat mechanics, with the idea being to make PvP fighting last longer (more health / level, better itemization and resists, etc). World PvP goals and new battle grounds designed actually to modify the world and game play for the faction holding landmarks. Shaman and Pallies on both sides, which will change the way both factions play (glad they changed this back, it was a good idea, but didn't work). Obviously 2 new races, with new starter areas (a whole zone each, with a bit less than 3 dozen quests each), not to mention that the whole world has been updated with new and modified quests to accomodate the new races in the lore. I don't think it takes much imagination to see that WoW version 2.0 is not just going to be more of the same, because the same endgame and the same pvp are what we're all tired of. Blizzard has tried at least to address these major issues, and I for one, believe they've done a great job with this expansion. Earley |
|
Page 1 of 1