All Posts by Noktaris

I don't know,I kind of thought he was amusing. Of course I been around gamers all my life...and he fits right in with alot of them.

Both my girlfriend and I tried LOTR...and man,was the most boring lackluster experience either of us ever had. The game truelly feels dull and boring to me.

We play EQ2 off and on (currently not subscribed) but we both love the game and will likely at some point after the expansion come back and play for awhile.

Just like all those 100's of Vanguard haters on these forums said it was going to be gone after a few more months after release...they was right! oh wait...no they was idiots. Most people spewing forth this nonsense are likely teens who are just looking to rile people up.

It really doesn't take many people to keep running a game...DAOC and Anarchy Online are proof of that.

I'm loving the game so far...but after playing the game a few times over the last few years at different conventions I knew I probably would. I've ran into quite a few minor annoyances. Mobs getting bugged untargettable,I've crashed 3 times now after my release timer goes to zero in scenario's,healers seem rediculously overpowered.

Despite the few negatives I'm still eagerly awaiting release. With as few problems WAR has right now it wont take them long at all to fix everything, and get the game running smoothly.

That was my first thoughts as well when I first got my Blood Elf a Raptor. but you do get used it,I don't even notice anymore.

I'm sure they wont...I bet they would love to get it out first. But whatever the case while WAR will undoubtedly cut into WoW's subscriptions,they wont be hurting much.

Normally I'm not a big person on graphics as long as the game play is good...but I can't even get slightly excited about this game (if and when it ever is released) because the graphics just look horrid to me. Just my personal opinion.

Adding    &fmt=18    at the end of the youtube video's address puts the vid in better quality.

Oh hey look,an original post. 

Come on,don't be silly...just because it does exist doesn't mean it's going to ever see the light of day. How many games have we seen thats started being produced and DID exist but got canned. I can think of a few...Original Warhammer,Ultima X: Odyssey are a few I remember.

I certainly wouldn't mind a delay if it meant getting the other cities and cut classes done. Of course I really didn't mind the cuts to begin with...I feel for the people whose classes got cut. But don't feel the Capital cities were a big loss.

If they say they can't get it done,then no amount on money is likely going to help them get it done any faster. I would imagine they are already working their asses off round the clock.

Better they cut while in beta and tell you about it,then let you buy the game and find out they lied...you know,like funcom?

I don't really see anything there saying they are going to be in the game at launch.  I've read all the posts by Mark Jacobs and nothing he says indicates the cities are going to be there at all till they are finished.

Rangers are very lacking...Barbarians are awesome,so awesome they will probably be nerfed (again) before long. But out of those 3 classes I would pick a Barbarian.

http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?start=0&topic_id=362386#4101890

I think it is a 50% bonus...not totally possitive on that. But I know it's not double exp.

Got level 80 a few weeks ago and super bored now. They have some raid content but it's nothing challenging and the loot and not very exciting. Have leveled 4 other alts...but now haven't logged in for like a week.

The group dungeons get boring real fast,but cool to do for the first few times. I'm sure the pvp can prolong the game for a little while longer,maybe.  ;)

SK's are a fun class but kind of lacking in the end game group instances. I really enjoyed my SK but was kind of sad about how poorly it performed at 80.