Dark Age of Camelot
Show Game Details
- Developer: EA Mythic
- Genre: Fantasy
- Status: Final
- Platforms:
- Website: http://www.darkageofcamelot.com
- Retail Price: 19.99 BUY IT
- Monthly Fee: 12.95
-
Dark Age of Camelot RSS Feed
Dark Age of Camelot » Round Table Pub (General) » Attention! Dark Age Of Camelot Has Announced A Brand New Server! The Revival Of DAOC Is Near!
| Thread (49 posts) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
altairzq 6/17/08 6:55:46 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 7/05/04
$$$OE$$$ |
Wow nice. Something the idiots at $$$OE will never do with classic EQ. I will try this new server. |
|
| |
||
|
kintrik 6/17/08 8:09:48 AM
|
||
|
Novice Member
Joined: 4/08/05 |
They are taking out the theurgists because they don't feel they have ever been able to balance them. They are adding the Valkyrie to midgard as the 3rd healer they never had at original launch. They are taking out the battlegrounds because they weren't there at launch, and instead want to get the 20+ crowd in the frontiers. They are adding 20+ objectives to the frontiers, and adding mechanics so red+ cons to the lower players can't even attack them. They are also adding 20+ objectives for the 20+ crowd to fight over, and exclude it from the higher level players. So all the extra land in Old Frontiers is going to be capturable towns and outposts some of it for lower level ranges and some of it for the 50s. If they release the server before WAR I will be on it, then the smart thing to do would be add a multi sub option like the station pass, and I'd play both DAoC Origins and WAR. (mostly WAR to be honest) |
|
| |
||
|
Mithios 6/17/08 8:28:06 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 11/13/07
All that it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing..."Edmund Burke" |
Originally posted by phantoswords
I agree. I hve yet to find an MMORPG that gave me the feeling the EQ and DAOC did when I played them for the first time. |
|
| A tiny mind is a tidy mind... |
||
|
Tatum 6/17/08 1:20:06 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 7/27/07 |
Originally posted by kintrik
Hmm, interesting. Glad to see that they're trying to compensate for removing the BG's. However, I'm not sure what to think about this idea if all levels will be sharing the same frontier. Might have felt more like the Old DAOC to just have lower level BG's and speed up the xp rate so everyone can get to "big boy" RvR faster. Still though, they have my attention. Will be interesting to see how all of this plays out... |
|
| |
||
|
Tatum 6/18/08 12:31:50 AM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 7/27/07 |
To answer one of my previous questions: Origin server will have rest xp. Not sure about anything else, as far as the level grind goes. Hard to imagine that it would be any where near as painful as it use to be. Anyway, I'm actually starting to get kind of hyped for this Already thinking about which Hib class I'd want to roll. Hmm... |
|
| |
||
|
Methe 6/22/08 1:58:50 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 6/22/08 |
I just registered to say one thing, and I know that a lot of people will agree with this. One of the things that I consider a mainstay of DAOC culture is the use of buffbots. It became so standard for any player that trying to copy the current "classic" servers policy of no buffs if your not grouped or in range just wont work. At its peak "fun-ness" RvR in Emain and Odins was a battle royale consisting of 8 v 8 groups and a completely separate war being waged exclusively by stealthers of all classes and races. The fun of being an assasin or archer was knowing that since you were buffed, there was a chance that you could pick someone out of a group of 4-8 and kill them and have a chance of getting away with it. Without buffbots this is not even a remote possibility because groups will always be buffed, and you will get stomped and have to run the hastener route again (assuming mythic is smart enough to re-implement hastener routes). If your trying to re-create the best things in dark age, you'd be SOL if you left this aspect out. Not to mention the obvious "no duh" factor of having most people paying you $15/twice a month for two accounts instead of one. So I dont see how Mythic could go wrong on this one, but im sure like in the past, this will get overlooked as a balance issue. I can name a list of people off the top of my head who WOULD be interested as hell in re-rolling on a server of this type, but as soon as they read "no buff bots" that interest will evaporate. As would mine. |
|
| DAOC Player from the Beginning... First 50 Armsman on Galahad. |
||
|
Catizone 6/22/08 7:56:28 AM
|
||
|
Apprentice Member
Joined: 4/28/08 |
Originally posted by phantoswords
I hated DAOC |
|
| |
||
|
Vistaakah 6/22/08 8:12:46 AM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 2/25/07 |
Though a novel interest at best it will draw a few back for a short time for nostalgic reasons. This is the only game i've seen make moves backward in times from TOA to classic and now Old Frontiers. This game went from 40-60k players on in prime time over the years to 4-5k on its best days. Though i've played off and on since the game was released its not the same game like it was at release. There is no real gaming community at all and it seems it has what i call alot of wow kiddies in it vs years ago it had a very mature crowd. DAOC isn't coming back to what it was and nothing will ever be able to recreate what it one was. People are looking for new not old games now. |
|
| |
||
|
Tatum 6/22/08 4:15:58 PM
|
||
|
Elite Member
Joined: 7/27/07 |
Originally posted by Vistaakah I dont think anyone is expecting a full-on revival from just one server. But, honestly, what else are we supposed to play right now? No one has managed to replace DAOC RvR (to this point) and I don't see anyone doing it in there near future. Origins looks like the only option right now. |
|
| |
||
|
Shohadaku 6/22/08 4:18:47 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member
Joined: 6/23/07
Ron Paul''s |
Maybe if I had tried DAOC from the start I would be into it, but when I tried it the graphics was waaaaayyy too dated. Anyways sounds like a good idea to run a origin ruleset. Best wishes for success |
|
|
Roin 6/22/08 4:24:47 PM
|
||
|
| ||

